It would be hyperbolic to assume that computers can outdo human understanding of nuances in language. While you have stated how to train it better, we humans ourselves have not mastered it, as often there might be conjecture, interpretation, and regionalisation where the same sentence could have multiple definitions. This renders the meaning of the same situation to have two conclusions. The simplest example I can think of is the questions "How are you?" and "I am fine"... but are you?
Great example! Yes, there's clearly more to communication than just the language, and there's more to a human psyche than just the communication. Infinite area for further exploration 💫 !
It would be hyperbolic to assume that computers can outdo human understanding of nuances in language. While you have stated how to train it better, we humans ourselves have not mastered it, as often there might be conjecture, interpretation, and regionalisation where the same sentence could have multiple definitions. This renders the meaning of the same situation to have two conclusions. The simplest example I can think of is the questions "How are you?" and "I am fine"... but are you?
Great example! Yes, there's clearly more to communication than just the language, and there's more to a human psyche than just the communication. Infinite area for further exploration 💫 !